SpaceMed Newsletter

Healthcare Facility Planning Tools and Guidelines

Volume 1, Number 2

 

Spring 2008

 

 

 

In This Issue

Newsletter Sign Up

 

 

 

Newsletter Archive

SpaceMed Home

About the Author

Planning a Medical Procedure Unit: Breaking Down Department Boundaries

Hospital Leaders Predict Growth in Telemedicine  

Customer Service Centers Are Gaining Momentum in the Healthcare Industry 

CT Scanner in 54 Square Feet? For Specialty Physicians it is Possible

Surgery Suite Capacity and Preliminary Space Need

Feature                                                                                           Print (PDF)

See the actual room-by-room space program

Planning a Medical Procedure Unit: Breaking Down Department Boundaries                                                       

BACKGROUND

Historically, same-day medical procedures at Midwest Medical Center (MMC) have been provided by a variety of different departments and scattered throughout the hospital with redundant patient reception/waiting, preparation, treatment, and recovery spaces. As demand for same-day medical procedures continued to grow, the hospital leadership was concerned that outpatient satisfaction was being compromised while operational costs were increasing dramatically. Department staff were inpatient-focused and reluctant to alter pre-established protocols and processes. They were also reluctant to consider any changes to their existing “turf.”

After several failed attempts at operational redesign, the serendipitous retirement of several key managers allowed MMC leadership to recruit a new manager who shared their vision. A variety of same-day medical procedures would be consolidated in an area that would function as the equivalent of the same-day surgery center and include flexible space for:

  • Prep and post-procedure recovery for endoscopy, invasive radiology, and other departments/procedures using conscious sedation.

  • Intravenous (IV) therapies such as transfusions, antibiotics, and hydrations.

  • Diagnostic procedures such as bone marrow aspirations/biopsies, liver biopsies, and paracentesis/thoracentesis.

  • Injections, allergy skin testing, and other similar procedures.

It was decided to refer to the new same-day medical service as the “medical procedure unit” or “MPU” to facilitate outpatient wayfinding. A business plan was prepared and operational processes were established and new job descriptions were developed in conjunction with facility planning.

PLANNING APPROACH

A detailed analysis was initially undertaken to identify the current and projected workload volumes and corresponding treatment spaces required:

  • Current workload volumes. Data on the current number of patients to be prepped, treated, and recovered in the new unit was collected along with the corresponding number of minutes. A total of 10,100 outpatients would qualify for the new unit (based on 2007 workload data) resulting in an average of 40 patients per day and an average length of stay of 106 minutes. However, 37 percent of the visits/procedures would be less than an hour.

  • Projected workload volumes. Future workload volumes were projected through 2012 for each treatment category. For example, endoscopy recoveries were projected to increase 5% per year consistent with the outpatient endoscopy growth assumptions while IV therapies were projected to increase 20% per year and pain clinic procedures were projected to remain constant at the 2007 volume. A projected average of 55 patients per day would receive treatment in the MPU by 2012.

  • Estimating the number of treatment spaces. Once the future workloads were projected for each procedure category, the current average minutes per procedure were used to estimate the number of treatment bays to be programmed. The projected annual minutes were divided by 250 days per year to determine the average number of treatment minutes required per day. This figure was then divided by 360 minutes per day (assuming an eight-hour shift with 75% occupancy) to estimate the number of treatment bays required. The analysis indicated that an average of 16.7 patients would be treated in the MPU at any given time, in addition to those undergoing an endoscopy procedure.

Analysis of Current Workload (2007)

 

Treatment

Annual

Visits

Annual

Minutes

Minutes/

Visit

Daily

Visits

IV Therapy

1,252

179,595

143

5

Blood Transfusion

772

253,865

329

3

Pain Clinic

697

25,280

36

3

Para/Thoracentesis

72

12,565

175

<1

Liver Biopsy

58

18,110

312

<1

Phlebotomy

131

4,325

33

<1

Other Visits

310

28,390

92

1

Imaging Prep  

1,920

153,250

80

8

Imaging Recovery

1,964

244,385

124

8

Endoscopy Recovery

1,610

86,790

54

6

Other Recovery

1,314

60,155

46

5

   Total

10,100

1,066,710

106

40

 

Projected Workload (2012) and Treatment Bay Calculation

 

Treatment

Annual

Visits

Annual

Minutes

Daily

Visits

Required

Bays

IV Therapy

3,115

446,836

13

5.0

Blood Transfusion

772

253,865

3

2.8

Pain Clinic

697

25,280

3

0.3

Para/Thoracentesis

120

20,942

<1

0.2

Liver Biopsy

90

28,102

<1

0.3

Phlebotomy

210

6,933

<1

0.1

Other Visits

500

45,790

2

0.5

Imaging Prep  

2,485

198,347

10

2.2

Imaging Recovery

2.485

309,214

10

3.4

Endoscopy Recovery

2,055

110,779

8

1.2

Other Recovery

1,314

60,155

5

0.7

   Total

13,843

1,506,242

55

16.7

 

  • Configuration of prep/treatment/recovery spaces. The following patient prep, treatment, and recovery spaces were programmed to optimize flexibility:

3 major procedure rooms (scoping procedures)

1 minor treatment/exam room (flexible, multipurpose room)

4 prep/holding bays (adjacent to the procedure rooms)

8 prep/treatment/recovery bays (three walls with curtain closure)

2 private prep/treatment/recovery rooms

6 prep/treatment/observation recliner chair bays

  • Space requirement. A total of 4,550 net square feet (NSF) was programmed as shown in the actual space program. The space includes a patient reception/intake area; prep, treatment, and recovery spaces (mix of enclosed rooms, partially enclosed, and open bays); and related support space. Applying a factor to accommodate internal corridors and the width of walls, columns, and utility shafts resulted in a total of 6,800 department gross square feet (DGSF).

  • Facility layout and location. Alternate facility layouts were evaluated to promote efficient staffing patterns and patient flow. An ideal location was selected on the first floor of the hospital adjacent to the emergency department’s nonurgent care (or fast track) area to facilitate use of the MPU space after-hours if needed for emergency care during peak workload periods. The new MPU would also be adjacent to the central imaging department and immediately accessible from the new customer service center that is planned near the main hospital entrance. An adjacent office suite (that could be relocated off the first floor) would provide future expansion space for the MPU as required.

CONCLUSION

Creation of the new MPU would not have been possible without the vision and strong leadership of the executive team and their facility planning consultant. Previous attempts by the organization to get input from individual department staff resulted in recommendations to simply maintain the status quo. Once the unit is operational for a year, hospital leadership will determine if there are other outpatient services that could potentially be incorporated into the MPU. For example, outpatient cardiac cath patients are currently transferred from the first floor to a third floor nursing unit for their recovery and outpatient chemotherapy patients receive treatment in the adjacent physician office building. back to top

Cynthia Hayward, AIA, ACHA, FAAHC

Principal

Hayward & Associates LLC

chayward@hayward-assoc.com

In the News

 

Hospital Leaders Predict Growth in Telemedicine

OVERVIEW

According to Futurescan 2008: Healthcare Trends and Implications 2008-2013, telemedicine (delivery of healthcare through the Internet) will be increasingly used to manage chronic and acute care conditions through continuous monitoring, real-time consultation, and delivery of pharmacologically-based treatments. The annual report from the Society for Healthcare Strategy and Market Development is written by an expert panel supported by data from a survey of over 1,400 healthcare leaders across the country. The report highlights eight important trends ranging from healthcare policy to physician employment and discusses their implications for hospital leaders and strategic planners. However, the section on technology titled “New Technologies Demand New Business Models” should be of particular interest to healthcare facility planners. 

SURVEY RESULTS REGARDING TECHNOLOGY

Of the survey respondents, 89 percent predicted that telemedicine will be “very likely” or “somewhat likely” to be used in their communities by 2013. In addition, the Internet will reduce variations in clinical practice by allowing the rapid diffusion of best practices according to 77 percent of the respondents. Other technical innovations are expected by 2013, but by fewer respondents. For example, 54 percent predicted that remote surgery would allow advanced care to patients irrespective of where they live. Also, 59 percent predicted that gene-based treatments would replace many traditional treatments and 54 percent predicted that nanotechnology would be used to cure disease or disability.

WHAT THE EXPERTS SAY

According to authors Jason Hwang, M.D., and Clayton Christensen, D.B.A., medical technology offers a seemingly endless stream of technological enablers that ought to make healthcare delivery simpler, faster, cheaper, convenient, and accessible. However, the fact that healthcare often seems to be moving in the opposite direction indicates a lack of innovative business models that incorporate the advantages of these new technologies. They cite examples of how hospitals have been intimately involved with the development of new delivery models over the years to separate standardized, rules-based care from the rest of the hospital. Examples include the creation of outpatient clinics to manage patients with chronic conditions and separation of nonurgent patients from trauma patients in the emergency room. Ironically, hospitals now find themselves lobbying against some of the newest models of healthcare delivery such as retail health clinics and specialty hospitals. These new competitors are often accused of cherry-picking only the healthiest patients even though they are using innovative business models designed to improve quality and increase profitability.

The experts suggest that hospitals view business model innovation as an opportunity rather than a threat, work to fix reimbursement so that prices accurately reflect value, and create autonomous business units with their own resources, processes, and profit formulas such as seeking out-of-pocket payments or by supporting physician-provided care with nurses and physician assistants. back to top

Trendline                                                                                       Print (PDF)

Customer Service Centers Are Gaining Momentum in the Healthcare Industry

BACKGROUND

In the traditional healthcare facility, multiple departments and staff are involved in customer intake and “processing” activities, including reception, admitting and registration, coordination of multiple appointments, cashiering, insurance verification, and physician referrals. This typically results in fragmented customer service and complicated wayfinding. Although many of these departments are located on the first floor of the facility, only a few staff in each department actually have face-to-face interaction with visitors, patients, and their families. The question is:  How can a healthcare organization better utilize both its staff and space to potentially enhance operational efficiency and improve customer service?

CURRENT TREND

With the continuing focus on patient-centered care and emergence of multihospital systems, information technology, and reengineering techniques, the trend is to consolidate customer intake, processing, and support services into a single operational unit. Such units are often referred to as a customer service center, patient service center, or similar designation. The term “customer” can refer to visitors, family members, employers, payers, physicians, staff, and vendors, in addition to the “patient” who is scheduled for an interview, examination, procedure, or admission.

The customer service center serves as the primary patient and visitor intake, processing, and communication area for a health­are facility or campus and also includes centralized patient/visitor amenities. The customer service center should be located directly inside the primary entrance to the healthcare complex to serve as the initial access point for visitors and most scheduled patients. This area can also function as a “home base” for family members and visitors who are spending increased time at the facility as more treatments and procedures are performed on a same-day basis.

KEY COMPONENTS

Functional components of the customer service center typically include:

  • Central reception/intake and communication area ― including the entrance vestibule, initial reception/communication station for dissemination of information and wayfinding, patient/visitor lounge, discharge lounge, and other amenities for patients and visitors (e.g., public toilets, phones, ATM machine, Internet kiosk).

  • Patient processing services ― including admitting, registration, insurance verification, scheduling, cashiering, billing questions, financial counseling, discharge planning, physician referral, patient/guest relations, and security.

  • Other optional services and amenities ― such as a patient library or education center, an outpatient/retail pharmacy, coffee shop, gift shop, spiritual/pastoral care, and support space for volunteers.

In this model, all staff work together as a team to provide quality care in an expedient manner. The staff are often cross-trained and report organizationally to a single manager, rather than to multiple department managers. Patient satisfaction generally improves as wayfinding is simplified, patient throughput is expedited, waiting times decrease, and continuity of care improves, thus reducing operational costs. Less space is needed on the first floor (i.e., prime real estate) and staff not directly involved in face-to-face customer contact are relocated.

Patient processing and support services are being affected by numerous initiatives. The emergence of multihospital systems and advances in information technology are influencing the demand for, and configuration of, these services. At the same time, institutionwide reengineering is challenging traditional, inefficient organizational structures and operational systems.

CONCLUSION

The healthcare industry is beginning to look to the hospitality industry for solutions to ongoing customer service problems resulting from archaic organizational structures and inadequate information systems. For example, when a customer visits a hotel, he/she is met by a central reception desk and comfortable lobby immediately upon entry. At this central reception desk, the customer can receive, or be networked with, any needed services including registration, paying his/her bill, receiving/sending faxes, getting directions, making a special request regarding housekeeping services, arranging transportation, or scheduling a massage. Yet the healthcare industry requires that its customers visit multiple locations and interact with multiple staff and fragmented systems ― assuming that they first determine the appropriate access point for their needed service. The customer service center concept replicates the main reception desk or “hub” found in an upscale hotel and connects its customers to various other services or “spokes” that may be remote.  back to top

Cynthia Hayward, AIA, ACHA, FAAHC

Principal

Hayward & Associates LLC

chayward@hayward-assoc.com

Technology

 

CT Scanner in 54 Square Feet? For Specialty Physicians it is Possible

OVERVIEW

Imagine a computed tomography (CT) scanner that can be installed in a room as small as six by nine feet, weighs 450 pounds, and plugs into a standard electrical outlet. Well, for eye, ear, nose, and throat physicians it is possible to provide point-of-care CT imaging in a clinic or an operating room.

ABOUT XORAN TECHNOLOGY'S MiniCAT

The Xoran Technology’s MiniCAT™ is specially designed for head and neck imaging allowing physicians to diagnose and treat their patients faster and more conveniently. It creates high-resolution, ultra-thin CT slices (0.3 mm for temporal bones), making it ideal for scanning the sinuses, skull base, and temporal bones. The availability of a limited footprint, In-office, upright CT scanner enables point-of-care imaging without the problems associated with scheduling CT scans at the hospital’s central imaging department. A scan takes only 40 seconds to get an immediate, digitally versatile CT image on a Windows PC monitor.

The actual dimensions of the unit are 46” x 49” x 72” tall. Although it can be installed in a room as small as 6’ x 9’, a room that is 80 to 100 NSF is recommended, or the equivalent of the size of a standard exam room. The MiniCAT scanner emits very low radiation so that it requires little or no shielding to comply with State regulations. The manufacturer can install it in a single day since its small footprint fits through a standard door frame and it weighs only 450 pounds.

The MiniCAT is compatible with most image-guided surgery systems and can also be used for surgical planning and post-operative evaluations and care. back to top

Rule-of-Thumb

 

Surgery Suite Capacity and Preliminary Space Need

 

Component

Capacity

Department

Gross Square

Feet (DGSF)

Comments

       

Inpatient

Surgery Suite

800 to 900
annual cases
per OR

2,400 to 2,500
DGSF per OR

Only 250 to 300 cases per open-heart surgery operating room (OR) should be assumed.

Outpatient

Surgery Suite

1,250 to 1,500
annual cases
per OR

2,800 to 3,000
DGSF per OR

Dedicated outpatient surgery suite or freestanding ambulatory surgery center.

Combined Suite

1,000 to 1,250
annual cases
per OR

2,500 to 2,800
DGSF per OR

 

Assumes 60-70% outpatients.

Inpatient Holding

 

One cubicle
 per OR

Multiplied by the percentage of inpatients.

 

Outpatient/Same-Day Admit Prep and Holding

 

One cubicle
 per OR

Multiplied by the percentage of outpatient and same-day admit patients.

Recovery:

Inpatient/Same-Day Admit Patients

 

Outpatients

(Phase I)

 

Outpatients

(Phase II)

 

 

1.5 cubicles
 per OR

 

One cubicle

per OR

 

Varies

 

Multiplied by the percentage of inpatients and same-day admit patients.

 

Multiplied by the percentage of outpatients.

 

Daily outpatient cases multiplied by the average recovery time and divided by the number of hours that the suite is staffed.

       
 

 

 

 

Note: DGSF represents the "footprint" of a department or functional area and includes the net square feet of the individual rooms as well as the space occupied by internal circulation corridors, walls/partition, and minor utility shafts; DGSF excludes common areas such as shared public corridors and lobbies, elevator banks, stairwells, major mechanical spaces, and the space occupied by the building's exterior wall.

Source: SpaceMed Guide (Second Edition).                                                   

back to top

www.spacemed.com

Copyright ©2008 SpaceMed. All rights reserved.